NLP - Nuero-linguistic programming

The true definition of NLP

is Cognitively Correct Language 

Transcript

Copy Transcript Copied

SPEAKER_00 2:37

Hello. Hello, we are recording. We are officially recording.

SPEAKER_02 2:42

Yes, we are.

SPEAKER_00 2:43

Okay. Hello, everyone. Um, nice to have you back. And um I am grateful to be here and speaking to all of our loyal listeners. Thank you. Thank you. And uh I've been meaning to say that for a long time, and I never properly said it to our listeners, so I'm saying it now.

SPEAKER_01 3:06

Yes.

SPEAKER_00 3:07

So thank you. And here we are again, um rehashing and rehashing. I think that's the incorrect word, but we uh continue on our presentations and our advocacy to bring to continually discuss the topics of intuitive cognitive development and how that is the most appropriate definition for human brain potential. Yes. And we are always looking for new ways to explain the fundamentals which are set and immutable and rigorous regarding the brain's requirements for its full potential and development, and it very much reflects the forces of the universe. So uh most people are thinking of brain potential differently than the way it actually works. So we look like the two craziest women on the whole planet. I I think I think that that is fair to say.

SPEAKER_02 4:20

Yeah, I we'd have I'd have to concur with that.

SPEAKER_00 4:26

So uh the topic that I wanted to bring up today was uh as the idea of NLP, neural linguistic programming, becomes more popular. And I will be fair to say that it's more popular in certain parts of the world than it is in others. Okay and so uh in my experience so far, and this is purely this is purely subjective, and this part is purely my opinion, but for the most part, when I speak to Americans, there's very few that have heard of neurolinguistic programming, and then when I ask them what they think it is, I get very many different answers. But I believe that the common trait that most people tend to understand is that uh communication or self-talk or a certain type of coding in the way that language is used is a very prominent element in the way that we can reconfigure the way we use our brains and reconfigure the way that we trust our own abilities and our own experiences, and that it's an ongoing process that does have a very compounding effect when you continue to use it, because few people tend you know realize that language does code the human brain, and so that is a significant factor. And we but but what's missing often, and this is where we stand in, uh, is that uh language is learned intuitively, so real neuro-linguistic programming that is warranted by the human brain or requisite for the human brain's potential, it it has to reflect a certain type of pattern. But to go back to my original point was that since we have to learn language intuitively when we're young, then the characteristics of neurolinguistic programming should be uh coded into the way that we're spoken to as children, so that as we're acquiring the intuitive, as we're engaging in the intuitive ability to learn language, it would already be uh fit or set or coded with the the algorithmic processes of the brain, of the human brain for unlimited intelligence, unlimited knowledge potential, uh, skills transferability, uh diversity as opposed to adversity, which is always limited and uh treacherously impinging on our um both our unique and common capabilities in life. And I know that was a big mouthful for saying the one question that I want to bring up. This why are we waiting until we become adults to have to relearn language, have to acquire neurolinguistic programming when that could be done when we're learning language intuitively? So that neurolinguistic programming is an automatic intuitive process, right? Right. So that's what we call cognitively correct language, which should be learned when we're young. But when oftentimes I find that when we're explaining what it is that kids need to know, it has taken me quite a while. I can be very dull sometimes, so it's taken me quite a while to realize that the picture in a lot of adults' minds is that we sit children down for a lecture and teach them um how to do something when the way that we treat them is how they learn how things are done. Right. There's there's a huge there's a huge difference there.

SPEAKER_02 9:03

So treat them and those around them.

unknown 9:07

Right.

SPEAKER_02 9:08

I mean it starts with that. It starts clearly the learning process starts with how we treat them as you know, as individuals, as children, as young, as young, uh little ones of us. But there's also since children are so observant and sponges of of information at that time, it also matters how you treat those who are engaging with your children.

SPEAKER_00 9:38

Right. And and the other the other uh hidden quality about neurolinguistic programming or cognitively correct language, as we like to say, is that um it uh I should say neuralizes the brain in a way where self-learning becomes self-evident. So it it compounds rather than uh having to just depend on learning that only comes at you in the form of teaching or dispensed information, right? Right, it it does have a compounding self-learning effect because neurolinguistic programming properly represents uh the forms of interconnectivity that reflect everything in the universe. So when people pronounce the idea of everything being interconnected, it's a great sentimentality. But the reality is that when people stop and examine all the things, if they should stop and examine all the things that they believe or the definitions they have for certain things, then there's a chance to take stock of what those definitions are and see if they are actually interconnecting with all the other diverse properties of anything and everything. Right. Because diversity is inextricably linked with intuition, so it makes things connected. We I think that I get the feeling sometimes that people tend to think that diversity means that some things are so different that one has nothing to do with the other, but diversification is always connected to the same properties as intuition. Um, and and and I think that I've wanted many times to really stress more and more how diversification is actually one of the greatest tools that we have in learning how things are interconnected, right? Because we tend to think that diversity means just respecting certain people as they are, um, or cultural uh esteems or whatever it is, rather than understanding that it's a learning process itself. And it's uh when I say a learning process, that means a proper learning from the beginning rather than unlearning something and then applying diversity, quote unquote, in such a way where we think it's just some sort of social interactive application. So there's something more inextricably definable about diversification that has to do with intuitive intelligence and cognition itself, right? So that the the the ways of learning in diversified ways already make so much acceptable to you because you're trusting the connections between things, but you're just trusting things in general because you know how well connected they are. So, you know, if you put a little bit of goodness over here, it sort of spreads to everything. If you put a little bit of poison over there, it also tends to spread to everything. That is very true. That's a little bit more elementary way of explaining it, but they the whole purpose of diversification is to make things connected, but with far more and say even infinite values uh that allow creativity to flow. So uh, you know, creativity, of course, like anything else, depends on intuition. And it's it's more than creativity that's connected to intuition. But if you'll we also have to understand that creativity is connected to far more many things than just say doing arts and crafts. Right.

SPEAKER_02 14:18

Um just like math is just like math is more than arithmetic, it's more than two plus two equals.

SPEAKER_00 14:27

Yes, and also math itself is the fundamental basis for creativity, for intuition, for diversification, because math itself, um, diversification is the fundamental principles of math that define everything and make everything interconnected. But if you look at the fun the fundamental principles of math, which are patterns, sorting, guessing, rhythm, rhyme, distance, uh, measurement, opposites, comparison, patterns, point zero, uh textures, the senses, fractals, all these things. Just even one of those principles alone has infinite possibilities and values, but they're all interconnected by the fact that they make up the forms and constructs of everything in the universe. They're interconnected in the fact that they're all fundamental math principles, and they're interconnected uh on the most fundamental principles of all mathematics of all mathematical principles, which are point zero and patterns, and then sequences and sorting and categories and classifications. I think those are the some of the ones that I missed mentioning before, but they are the most fundamentals, uh, beginning fundamentals of all the fundamental math principles. And then there's the more complex versions, which always everything always includes at least probably two mathematical principles, which would be point zero and patterns, and then sequences, of course. So uh everything's connected on those very fundamental bases, and I know that everything that I'm saying now sounds inapplicable or irrelevant to everything that people think about on a daily basis, but that is because those things are what make up neurolinguistic programming, and then when we are learning language intuitively as young children, if everything we're learning is always given that little magic wand of diversification, especially during the preschool stage, like how can we diversify this particular thing? Um, how can we learn uh uh creativity and um literacy or association, which is the fundamental principle for literacy development, numbers, which are based on all of the fundamental mathematical principles, right? Right. Um, but is really more of one of the first is really the symbols is also one of those principles, and um numbers itself is really I I would say other than consciousness, which would have been the first artificial intelligence prospect based on the the innate parts of intuition and our multidimensional senses, but um numbers would be sort of the next upgrade af after language, which was intercepted by cognitively incorrect uh prospects, right? If you're gonna if you're gonna give them that sort of integrity, we could say that. Um that do they deserve that kind of integrity? Uh nah. But uh we'll we'll we'll leave it there like that. And um so uh the intuitive development of language is extremely significant to uh how we are able to take control of, I guess if you want to just say our destinies, but also our abilities, and doing that upgrade that ends up producing the byproduct of that sense of consciousness, and the more and more we develop our intuition, and even though it's a conscious pro uh conscious program in adulthood, uh the focus has to be on the intuition to achieve or attain that greater collective consciousness. We each have to be part of that tapestry, so um, but it's not rather than people thinking about consciousness itself as something you do, and this is this is definitely reiteration of things that we have mentioned before, but I wanted to give a little extra highlight to neurolinguistic programming today in that context because people are more familiar with it, true, and we need to see how it works for brains that are developing so that diversification and intuition and cognition can be the one whole identical thing that it really is.

SPEAKER_02 20:00

And of course, keeping the potential intact, yes, yes, that is critical at this point, right?

SPEAKER_00 20:08

Very, very critical, and we know that that that molding, that pure cementing um really takes place more during the three to five-year-old stage when uh the foundation of emotional intelligence has been laid. So the invisible stuff, and now we and now at the preschool stage from three to five, we have to do we have to attach the visible stuff so that we could put more definition into that idea that we're spiritual beings having a physical experience or emotional beings having a physical experience, right? Then it comes together. So, with that, I will leave our audience until the next time. Thank you so much for being here. Thank you guys, glad you're with us.

SPEAKER_02 20:58

Absolutely, absolutely okay. However, buy me a coffee, buy me a coffee too, and tell your friends about this podcast. Um, if anybody has any questions about this or anything else that we've said, Carla and I are more than happy to answer your questions at Gott Podcast, Scott BrainPodcast at gmail.com. Sorry, gotbrain podcast at gmail.com.

SPEAKER_00 21:29

Yeah, pretty simple.

SPEAKER_02 21:30

We welcome any questions at all.

SPEAKER_00 21:34

Any questions at all.

SPEAKER_02 21:36

So I hope you all have a great day and we will see you soon.

SPEAKER_00 21:40

Okay, ciao. Bye-bye, everyone.